<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Best Three Techniques to Have a Search Engine Friendly URL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.seotown.net/the-best-three-techniques-to-have-a-search-engine-friendly-url/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.seotown.net/the-best-three-techniques-to-have-a-search-engine-friendly-url/</link>
	<description>SEO Blog about Search Engine Optimization &#38; Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:08:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GS</title>
		<link>http://blog.seotown.net/the-best-three-techniques-to-have-a-search-engine-friendly-url/comment-page-1/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>GS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.seotown.net/?p=404#comment-300</guid>
		<description>Is true, from the SEO point of view static urls are better but I&#039;m worried regarding the resource usage, for a site with a lot of traffic is important in my opinion but obviously I prefer the seo friendly urls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is true, from the SEO point of view static urls are better but I&#8217;m worried regarding the resource usage, for a site with a lot of traffic is important in my opinion but obviously I prefer the seo friendly urls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
